Transcendence: “God is separate from and independent of
nature and humanity. God is not simply
attached to, or involved in, His creation.
He is…superior to it in significant ways.”[1]
Sometimes, dearest reader, I forget how supreme God is. Not that I have ever actually comprehended
His greatness, His majesty, His divinity.
No one can. But there are times
that I get so bogged down in details: in presence, in need, in immediacy, in
any number of soul-numbing-albeit-true postures, that I forget. And it takes more than just lifting my eyes
heavenward to see what I’m missing. It
takes purposed and intentional focus to expand my field of vision, to seek
after the God Who Is (present, active, indicative). This is why I need to focus on God’s
transcendence; not because I want a fancy five dollar, seminary word
[yes, sometimes it feels like these lessons have a word-by-word price tag],
but because I need to remember, in my being, who El Roi –
the God Who Sees Me
– truly is. And from what I’ve seen of
the modern, western Church, so do the rest of us.
Let’s first clear up what transcendence isn’t. It is not a superiority determined by
elevation. God is not above creation in the way that clouds
are above my house. We must remember, particularly as a moderns
who recognize that our planet is part of a heliocentric system, in a similar
galaxy, …ad infinitum…that God is not
bound by a physical form. He existed,
eternally, before He created matter, space, and time ex nihilo {out of
nothing}. Therefore, His transcendence is not in any way
related to, or dependent upon, His location as it relates to His creation.
We
must also be aware, as the scholar Ray Dunn notes, that God’s transcendence is
tempered with His immanence {the attribute of God’s
nearness to His creation}. Dunn
remarks that a God who is solely transcendent would not initiate or maintain
any relation to human beings and would therefore be completely unknowable and
irrelevant to his creation.[2] However, God’s transcendence is balanced
biblically with his immanence through the affirmations that “God is living,
holy, and One.”[3] To that end, Dunning finds that in the New
Testament the “glory of God…[and] the self-disclosure of God, [have]…its locus
is in the person of Jesus Christ,”[4]
which is substantiated by Colossians 1:15-20.
Thus, God, who is absolutely, eternally, and infinitely existing in a
state of greater-than-ness in
relation to His creation {aka: transcendence} manifests
His equally absolute, eternal, and infinite nearness to creation {aka:
immanence} in the person of Jesus through the incarnation.
In scripture, there are four men in particular who
experienced the truth that God is separate from, and elevated over and above, His
creation. Moses, Isaiah, Paul, and John
speak of these occurrences, with all but Paul including narrative evidence of
their experiences in scripture. Moses’
encounter of a part of the glory of God
is found in Exodus 33:18-19; Isaiah had a vision of God seated on his throne in
heaven in Isaiah 6:1-5; and John penned the book of Revelation, which is filled
with the mysteries of God’s majesty and greatness. In both the Mosiac and Isaiachic vignettes,
the men involved cannot look at the glory of God; he is described as
other-worldly, bright and so glorious that Moses and Isaiah are at risk of
death simply by being fallen creatures in close proximity to Almighty God.
The glory to which these men refer is a concept of
“otherness” which Dunn says is a means
of “divine self-disclosure;” it is expressed by the “term ‘glory,’” which “originally meant ‘weight’ and carries the
connotation of something solid or heavy.
It is often used of that which is impressive,
such as wealth or honor.”[5] Throughout the scriptures, this word “also
came to suggest the idea of ‘brightness’ or ‘radiance.’”[6] Dunning also notes that because God revealed
Himself through glory, there exists a theological implication of invisibility,
such that God’s “glory is the visible manifestation of the being of God.”[7] Bruce Demarest and Gordon Lewis support the
theory of implied invisibility by pointing to the fact that God approached
Moses in Exodus 19:19 as a dense cloud at Sinai.[8] This expression of God’s being through
non-anthropomorphic {not having human-like qualities} means
is also intended to further attest to his glory. Similarly, Demarest and Lewis point to the
thunder, lightning, and earthquake in verses 16 and 18 as symbolic of God’s
“awesome majesty and power.”[9] Thus, God’s ontological {existential
state of} separateness from His visible and material creation is
equivalent to his transcendence; and his transcendence is evidence of his
power, majesty, and glory.
Where Theology Can Go
Wrong
If
one overlooks God’s transcendence by focusing only on His personal and
relational communion with that which He has created, such as individual human
beings, one may fail to recognize the gravity of sin as it relates to a perfect
and holy God; and thereby miss the necessity of Christ’s complete and absolute
substitution for sin on behalf of the world.
Conversely, the over emphasis of God’s separate and otherness from His creation can lead to a deistic theology which
says that God does not intervene in creation history anymore. This view negates miracles, renders prayer a
pointless exercise, and makes religion hollow and rote. God merely becomes a disinterested party who
is waiting out the salvation clock until the Age to Come.
Neither of these views are adequate
representations of what God has revealed to us in the Holy Scriptures or
through His Son, Jesus Christ. Thus we
must hold God’s perfect transcendence in conjunction with His perfect
immanence. As with omnipresence, God is
both near to us because He loves us, and removed from us because He is
holy.
Summary:
God’s transcendence is an expression of His
absolute perfection and holiness over and above all of creation. It makes His perfect mercy and justice
available to His creation, both of which are expressed in and through the immanent
incarnation of his Son.
[1] Erickson, Millard
J. Christian
Theology, Second Edition. Grand
Rapids: Baker Academic, 1998. Page 338.
[2] Dunning, H. Ray.
Grace, Faith, and Holiness: A Wesleyan Systematic Theology. Kansas City: Beacon Hill Press, 1988. Page
116.
[3] Ibid., page 190.
[4] Ibid., page 104.
[5] Dunning, H. Ray.
Grace, Faith, and Holiness: A Wesleyan Systematic Theology. Kansas City: Beacon Hill Press, 1988. Page 101-102.
Emphasis: mine.
[6] Ibid., page 102.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Demarest, Bruce and
Gordon Lewis. Integrated Theology: Knowing the Ultimate Reality of the Living God.
vols 1 & 2. Grand Rapids: Academie
Books, 1987. Page 184.
[9] Ibid.
Want to know where we've been in this series? Click the links below for more.
Why Theology?
How do we do this?
What are attributes?
What's Omnipresence?
Want to know where we've been in this series? Click the links below for more.
Why Theology?
How do we do this?
What are attributes?
What's Omnipresence?
No comments:
Post a Comment